Government and industry make second attempt to kill pesticide case

Neonicotinoid pesticides have been linked to mass bee die-offs and declining pollinator
populations

TORONTO — Environmental groups, represented by Ecojustice, are back in Federal Court
tomorrow in an effort to protect pollinators from a harmful class of pesticides and fend off a
second attempt by multinational pesticide companies and the federal government to dismiss
their lawsuit that challenges the practices of Canada’s Pest Management Regulatory Agency
(PMRA).

“This case could set an important precedent for evidence-based, precautionary regulation of
pesticides in Canada. It deserves a hearing,” said Charles Hatt, Ecojustice lawyer.

The David Suzuki Foundation, Friends of the Earth Canada, Ontario Nature and the Wilderness
Committee argue that the PMRA’s practice of registering neonicotinoid pesticides without the
necessary science required to determine the pesticides’ risks to pollinators is unlawful.

In July, the federal government and several multinational pesticide companies lost their bid to
shut down the environment groups’ lawsuit that challenges the PMRA’s continued registration of
neonicotinoid pesticides (neonics). Now, they are appealing the ruling that ordered a hearing is
necessary to determine whether the PMRA is following its own legislation.

Environmental groups have tracked the science linking neonics and declining pollinator
populations with mounting concern. The science clearly shows neonics pose serious risks to
pollinators and have become ubiquitous contaminants in ecosystems throughout the world.

Ecojustice lawyers representing the groups argue that the July ruling must stand. They say
dozens of agricultural pesticides containing two neonicotinoid active ingredients (Clothianidin
and Thiamethoxam) have been persistently unlawfully registered in Canada, in some cases
without any public consultation.

“The use of neonicotinoids in Canadian agriculture is known to cause declines in pollinator
populations, and mounting scientific studies show that neonics are a bad bet for our
environment and our pollinators. So why has the PMRA allowed neonics to be used as
“conditional” registrations while it waits for the science it says is needed to assess the
pesticides’ risks?” said Eric Reder, Wilderness and Water Campaign Director for the Wilderness
Committee.

The world’s largest study on neonics, published in a June issue of Science, showed widespread
evidence of population decline and shortened lifespans in domesticated and wild bees
populations exposed to neonics. A separate study, conducted in Canada and published in the
same journal, discovered that prolonged exposure to neonicotinoids affects honey-bee health in
corn-growing regions. In September, the Task Force on Systemic Pesticides previewed its
updated survey findings that neonics represent a “major worldwide threat to biodiversity and
ecosystems.” Finally, in October a novel study showed that honey samples from across the
world are contaminated with ecologically concerning levels of neonics, and contamination is
highest in North America.

“Decision-makers in the European Union, France, and Ontario have already opted to heavily
restrict neonicotinoid use. Rather than follow these precautionary examples Canada has taken
years to study the problem and allowed for even more widespread use of neonics, letting the
market use these risky pesticides,” Beatrice Olivastri, CEO of Friends of the Earth Canada.

“Humans rely so greatly on the services that pollinators provide for free. They are essential for
fruits, vegetables, nuts and 90 per cent of flowering plants. Neonicotinoid use recklessly
gambles with the health of our environment,” said Caroline Schultz, Ontario Nature’s Executive
Director.

“We are deeply concerned to see the government being so laissez-faire about neonicotinoids’
risks to pollinators,” said Faisal Moola, David Suzuki Foundation Director General for Ontario
and Northern Canada. “In approving these deadly pesticides despite evidence of harm to
pollinators and other beneficial species, the government has failed to protect the environment
from unacceptable risks.”

The federal Pest Control Products Act requires the PMRA to have “reasonable certainty” that a
pesticide will cause no harm to the environment before registering it. For more than a decade,
the PMRA has continuously granted “conditional” registrations for two neonicotinoid pesticides,
putting off for a later day its review of scientific information on the pesticides’ risks to pollinators.
Years later the PMRA is still waiting for studies sufficient to justify “full” registration of the
pesticides.

About:
Neonics are systemic chemical insecticides that are intended to control crop-destroying pests. They pose
threats to non-target organisms like native bees, which are responsible for pollinating one third of the
world’s crops and 90 per cent of all wild plants.

Ecojustice is Canada’s largest environmental law charity. Ecojustice goes to court and uses the power of
the law to defend nature, combat climate change, and fight for a healthy environment for all.

Wilderness Committee is Canada’s people-powered, citizen-funded wilderness protection group.
Ontario Nature protects wild species and wild spaces through conservation, education and public
engagement.

The David Suzuki Foundation’s mission is to protect the diversity of nature and our quality of life, now
and for the future.

Friends of the Earth Canada (www.foecanada.org) is the Canadian member of Friends of the Earth
International, the world’s largest grassroots environmental network campaigning in 75 countries on
today’s most urgent environmental and social issues.

-30-

Environmental groups back in court as government, industry make second attempt to kill pesticide case

Science and Learning Centre

Join our email community