Why carbon capture and storage is not a real climate solution

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is often pointed to as a climate solution by Big Oil and Gas. Here are the main reasons why it isn’t a climate solution.

Graphic illustrating that carbon capture and storage, or CCS, involves capturing CO2 from sources such as power generation and industrial facilities that use fossil fuels.

What is carbon capture and storage?

Carbon capture and storage, or CCS, involves capturing CO2 from sources such as power generation and industrial facilities that use fossil fuels. The captured CO2 is compressed and transported, used to extract more oil or injected into deep geological formations.

Graphic illustrating that five decades after the first carbon capture project, the technology has captured just 0.001 per cent of global emissions.

Addresses just 15 per cent of oil and gas emissions

Five decades after the first carbon capture project, the technology has captured just 0.001 per cent of global emissions. Using the technology does not have any impact on the approximately 80 per cent of oil and gas emissions from downstream use when fossil fuels are burned in places like cars and furnaces.

Graphic illustrating that seventy per cent of carbon captured through CCS in Canada is used to help extract more oil.

Used to extract more oil and increase production

CCS can grow the very emissions it should reduce. Most of the CO2 being captured is being used to pump more oil out of the ground that would have been out of reach. Seventy per cent of carbon captured through CCS in Canada is used to help extract more oil.

Graphic illustrating that reducing oil and gas emissions with carbon capture can cost up to 10 times more than cutting the same emissions using wind and solar.

One of the most expensive ways to reduce emissions

Most CCS projects never get off the ground because the technology is too expensive. Reducing oil and gas emissions with carbon capture can cost up to 10 times more than cutting the same emissions using wind and solar. CCS has benefited from more than $9 billion in support from the federal government to date, a subsidy to the hugely profitable fossil fuel industry.

Graphic illustrating that building carbon capture infrastructure, capturing and compressing CO2, building more infrastructure to pipe captured carbon and developing geological storage sites require lots of energy.

Uses a lot of energy

Building carbon capture infrastructure, capturing and compressing CO2, building more infrastructure to pipe captured carbon and developing geological storage sites require lots of energy.

Graphic illustrating that building more CCS projects would not have a meaningful impact on national emissions in the critical decade ahead.

Slow to be built

There are seven CCS projects operating in Canada, capturing about 0.5 per cent of national emissions. Building more CCS projects would not have a meaningful impact on national emissions in the critical decade ahead.

graphic illustrating that CCS does not address the necessity of rapidly shifting from fossil fuel use to keep global warming below catastrophic levels within this decade.

Misses climate goals

CCS does not address the necessity of rapidly shifting from fossil fuel use to keep global warming below catastrophic levels within this decade.

carbon capture and storage fact

Real climate solutions are more effective and affordable

It has never been easier or more affordable to use options like renewable energy, electrifying homes and transportation and making buildings and industries more energy-efficient.