Understanding food, body care and cleaning eco-certifications and labels

Greenwashing on product labels

Greenwashing is when companies make exaggerated or false claims of environmental or social responsibility to cover harmful and/or unethical practices. A 2021 study revealed that eight in 10 people in Canada value sustainability, with over half buying more eco-friendly products compared to five years ago. As people become more eco-conscious, they’ll buy products that align with their values. To meet consumer demands, many companies are adjusting their practices to offer more environmentally friendly products. To find those, people turn to product labels and/or descriptions for guidance and assurance. But not all these efforts are genuine. Some companies and brands use unregulated terms as greenwashing tactics to create the illusion of sustainability without adhering to or adopting eco-friendly practices and standards.

Enter: the buzzwords! “Green,” “eco-friendly,” or “natural” are just a few examples of popular terms often used as greenwashing techniques in labelling and advertising. Most of these terms are not regulated in Canada. They can be applied on products without third-party verification or proof. This lack of oversight allows companies to mislead consumers into believing their products are environmentally responsible when they may not be — especially when the product doesn’t have a verified eco-certification.

Other signs of greenwashing:

• Misleading imagery. Some companies use images of nature, greenery or other symbols in their advertising and branding. This creates an impression of environmental responsibility when core business practices and ingredients may be unsustainable.
• Token sustainable products. Companies may introduce a small line of eco-friendly products while continuing to use unsustainable production methods. This creates an illusion of a commitment to sustainability.
• Lack of transparency. Does the company disclose information about ingredient sourcing, labour conditions or environmental impacts? You can’t assess a company’s true sustainability efforts without those.

ECOLABELS TO LOOK FOR AND UNREGULATED TERMS TO LOOK OUT FOR

Trusted ecolabels to look for on all products

A few eco-certification programs cover a wide array of product types and can be found on food, body care and cleaning products.

• B Corp. Certified B Corporation brands and companies uphold rigorous standards of social and environmental performance, accountability and transparency. Areas covered include employee benefits, charitable giving, supply chain practices and materials sourcing.
• EcoCert. The independent body certifies their own products> It sets and oversees its own standards for organic and environmentally friendly products. It uses binding contracts, audits and reviews to maintain its reputation as a trusted label for socially responsible, sustainable, organic and fair trade brands. EcoCert administers and oversees more than 150 ecolabels worldwide.
• ECOLOGO. Certified products are independently verified to have a lower impact on the environment and human health. These certifications are voluntary and based on multiple environmental factors across the product’s life cycle.

Food labels

The volume of claims used and certifications available makes understanding food labels challenging. Some claims are heavily regulated in Canada, while others are misleading or vague.

Trusted ecolabels and/or regulated terms to look for on food labels:

• Canada Organic. “Organic” is a regulated term. Any food product labelled organic and displaying the Canada Organic logo was produced following Canadian Organic Standards and certified by a third party.
• FairTrade Canada. Products with this label meet rigorous standards for social, economic and environmental sustainability. It’s crucial to distinguish this from less stringent fair trade claims and labels that may not meet the same level of transparency and scrutiny.
• Local. Federal government policy is that food products labelled “local” have been produced in the province or territory in which it’s sold. Food sold across provincial borders within 50 kilometres of the originating province or territory can also have this label.
• Rainforest Alliance Certified. One or more key ingredients in products with this label come from a farm or forest operation that meets comprehensive standards that protect the environment and promote the rights and wellbeing of workers, their families and communities.
• USDA Organic. This verifies that the product has been certified organic by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and imported under Canada’s organic equivalency agreement.

Commonly used non-regulated terms and/or claims to look out for on food labels:

Some food products in Canada are more prone to being marketed with non-regulated buzzwords and terms. Animal-based food products, in particular, face far greater consumer scrutiny regarding environmental, ethical and health concerns. This prompts producers and suppliers to use regulated and non-regulated certifications to appeal to market demands.

Eggs and poultry:

• Cage-free and/or free-run. Implies that chickens were not kept in cages. The reality? Chickens can move freely indoors but may not have outdoor access or better living conditions beyond the absence of cages. Conventional cages in Canada must be phased out by 2036 as per the Code of Practice for the Care and Handling of Laying Hens.
• Farm fresh. Implies that the product is fresh and comes directly from a farm. The reality? All eggs come from farms and the term doesn’t indicate freshness beyond industry standards.
• Free-range. Implies that chickens have access to the outdoors. The reality? They’re often kept in open barns, uncaged and with access to the outdoors when weather is ideal. The quality and quantity of time outdoors is not monitored or reported.
• Free run. Implies that chickens were not kept in cages and can move freely indoors. The reality? No guaranteed outdoor access or spacious living conditions. Chickens may be kept in confined, cramped indoor spaces.

Other animal-based products:

• 100 per cent grass-fed or grass-fed. Implies the animals’ diet was made up entirely of forages like grass and hay. The reality? The animal may have had access to grazing or grass feed for a portion of its life but fed grains for other periods. The term is not regulated in Canada and there are no provincial or national standards to defining the claim.
• Antibiotic-free. Implies that no antibiotics were given to the animal during its lifetime. The reality? While this may reflect better management of animal health, it doesn’t necessarily mean animals were raised in better conditions overall. Antibiotics are sometimes necessary to prevent or treat disease. Producers using this label may instead employ alternative disease prevention methods that are more harmful to human, animal and environmental health.
• Hormone-free. Implies that no hormones were administered to the animals. The reality? Hormones are not permitted for use in poultry in Canada so this label cannot be used on eggs. If used on a label for meat, poultry or fish products, it’s misleading. All are given naturally occurring hormones.
• Humane. Indicates that the animals were treated with care and raised in ethical conditions. The reality? No legal definition of “humane” in Canada. The term is subjective and can vary depending on the farm or producer.
• Natural or naturally raised. Implies that the animals were raised without artificial interventions. The reality? This term is extremely vague. There are no regulations that dictate what “natural” means, and it does not guarantee organic feed, antibiotic-free living or outdoor access. Canada currently has an outcome-based approach for “natural” claims that give companies the liberty to only partially follow the guidelines.
• Sustainable. Implies that the farming practices used to raise the animals were environmentally friendly and focused on reducing ecological impact. The reality? This is a broad, unregulated term used as a greenwashing tactic. There’s no standardized definition and sustainability claims vary widely.
• Pasture-raised. Implies that the animals were raised cage-free outdoors on pasture. The reality? There are no legal or regulated definitions of what defines an animal or animal by-product as “pasture-raised.” The animal may have been raised primarily outdoors. There’s no guarantee it spent its entire life on pasture.

Body care product labels

Body care products often have an array of claims, buzzwords and terms on their packaging. It can be overwhelming!

Unlike food products, some reputable certifications for body care products aren’t printed on the product but appear in digital marketing and e-commerce. Check the company websites for more information and potential ecolabels.

Trusted body care ecolabels:

• EWG Verified. These meet the Environmental Working Group’s strictest standards for consumer health and transparency.
• Leaping Bunny. Verifies the companies have no animal testing practices in all stages of product development. The companies’ ingredient suppliers have also committed to 100 per cent free of animal testing.

Commonly used non-regulated terms and/or claims to look out for on body care labels:

• Biodegradable. Implies the product or packaging will break down naturally and safely in the environment. The reality? There are no strict regulations governing the use of “biodegradable” in beauty products. It can vary in meaning. In some cases, only a portion of the product may biodegrade, or it may break down under only specific conditions.
• Cruelty-free. Implies that the product or its ingredients were not tested on animals. The reality? Several reputable third-party organizations certify cruelty-free products, like Leaping Bunny. But Health Canada does not impose any standards for cruelty-free claims related to animal testing on cosmetic products.
• Hypoallergenic. Implies the product is less likely or will not cause an allergy or allergic reaction. The reality? This is not a legal or scientific term. There is no such thing as a “non-allergenic cosmetic.”
• Natural. Implies the product contains ingredients derived from natural sources, such as plants, minerals or animals. The reality? There is no official standard for “natural” in body care products. A product may still contain synthetic ingredients or may be minimally derived from natural sources.
• Organic. Implies the ingredients to make the product were grown without synthetic pesticides, fertilizers and chemicals. The reality? The term is heavily regulated on food products, but not on body care product labels. Unless the product is certified by a recognized, reputable body, it’s not required to meet the same strict standards.
• Non-toxic. Implies the product does not contain harmful or toxic ingredients. The reality? The term “non-toxic” is not defined or regulated. Products can still contain chemicals that might be harmful in certain amounts. They can be marketed as non-toxic based on the company’s criteria.

Cleaning product labels

Cleaning products are notorious for greenwashing. The best solution? Make your own using environmentally friendly ingredients you probably already have at home.

Trusted ecolabels to look out for on cleaning products labels:

• EWG Verified. EWG Verified cleaning products meet the Environmental Working Group’s strictest standards for consumer health and transparency.
• Green Seal. One of the world’s most trusted ecolabels for cleaning products and services. Certified products meet their standards for performance, safety and health.
• Leaping Bunny. Verifies the companies has no animal testing practices in all stages of product development. Ingredient suppliers have also committed to 100 per cent free of animal testing.
• Safer Choice. Guarantees the product was made with the safest possible chemical ingredients under the program’s rigorous criteria for health and environmental safety. Governed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency. Imported cleaning products are sold in Canada with this label.

Commonly used non-regulated terms and/or claims to look out for on cleaning product labels:

• Green. Implies that the product is environmentally friendly or made with sustainable practices. The reality? It’s a broad, non-regulated term that can be used without clear standards.
• Baby-safe. Implies that the product is gentle and safe for use around babies and small children. The reality? There are no specific standards to define what makes a product “baby-safe.” Products may contain ingredients that are harmful if ingested or contact sensitive skin. Check ingredients lists carefully.
• Biodegradable. Like on beauty products, implies the product or packaging will break down naturally and safely in the environment. The reality? There are no strict regulations for what qualifies as “biodegradable” in cleaning products, and many substances labelled biodegradable only break down under specific conditions, such as in industrial composting facilities.
• Dye-free. Implies that the product does not contain added synthetic dyes. The reality? The term is not regulated and is generally used to appeal to consumers concerned about artificial colours. It’s usually an accurate claim, though doesn’t guarantee the product is free from other potentially harmful substances.
• Natural. Implies the product contains ingredients derived from natural sources, such as plants, minerals or animals. The reality? There is no official standard for “natural” in cleaning products. A product labelled as “natural” may still contain synthetic ingredients. Or it may be minimally derived from natural sources.
• Non-toxic. Implies that the product is free from harmful or toxic chemicals. The reality? There are no clear, shared definitions of what “non-toxic” means in cleaning products in Canada. While it implies safety, products can still contain chemicals that may be harmful in certain quantities or over long-term exposure. There’s no standardized testing for this claim. The best way to avoid toxic chemicals? Make your own cleaning products.
• Plant-based. Suggests that the product’s active ingredients are derived from plants rather than synthetic chemicals. The reality? “Plant-based” can be used loosely. While some of the products may use plant-based ingredients, they may still contain synthetic chemicals or preservatives. The overall environmental impact may not be significantly different from conventional products.
• Vegan. Implies that the product does not contain any animal-derived ingredients. The reality? Like “cruelty-free,” “vegan” is not regulated in cleaning products. A product labelled as vegan still may be tested on animals.